He Said, She Said: Paul Ryan

Is Paul Ryan bad for women?


Mitt Romney handed Barack Obama a potentially winning new slogan for his campaign for re-election in November: ‘Paul Ryan is bad for women.’ 

As much as Romney would prefer the upcoming election to be a referendum on Obama’s financial policy, his will probably force social issues to take center stage.

Romney has worked hard to avoid discussing his mixed record on topics like women’s reproductive rights and health care reform, but Ryan’s entry into the campaign trail may render that impossible.

Ryan may also erode any lasting sliver of hope Romney had of winning back the support of conservative single women who have felt alienated by the Republican Party. Ryan has been a prominent figure in the recent “war on women,” voting to defund Planned Parenthood four times and vocally supporting overturning Roe v. Wade, seeking to make abortion illegal even in cases of rape and incest. 

Ryan also co-sponsored the federal Sanctity of Human Life Act, which sought to give a fertilized embryo all the “legal and constitution attributes and privileges of personhood.” This is in spite of the fact that personhood amendments have been thus far unpopular on state ballots and would make certain forms of birth control and in vitro fertilization treatments illegal. Ryan also supported the Protect Life Act, nicknamed the ‘Let Women Die Act’ by Democrats, that would have allowed hospitals to deny women emergency abortion care, even in a life-or-death situation for the mother.

In 2009, Ryan voted against the relatively uncontroversial Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which passed without his support and grants women protection from being denied equal pay for equal work. This is not to mention Ryan’s consistent lack of support for LGBT rights, his record on immigration, and his much lauded budget plan that would slash safety net programs and dismantle Medicare as we know it.

The full impact of Romney’s selection of Paul Ryan as his running mate will not be known until the election in November. But as the race heats up in the next two months, it seems Ryan’s deeply conservative stances on social issues may do more harm than good. 

Sean Joyce August 24, 2012 at 01:51 AM
Ms. Dawson, I understand your argument is simply a punch-list of liberal talking points about Romney-Ryan and the normal arguments trying to paint conservatives as warriors against women, but I have to disagree. First, you worry that Romney's choice Ryan pick will alienate single conservative women, which (unless you are admitting to be a single conservative woman) is out of place. Ryan polled well with and is meeting the expectations of voters targeted by the Romney campaign, which is the very reason he was chosen. I also don't know who these conservative single women you refer to are, since most of the women I know who are conservative don't fear the government taking over their "reproductive lives"; they are worried about the government wasting their hard earned money. Second, most conservatives feel that social issues are best left to the states, which allows those who want to follow certain values to do so. This particular method was in use before Roe v. Wade and there were 30 states that did not allow abortions and 20 states that did in some form. The third issue I have are the extremes to which everyone who shares your beliefs (that conservative social values are harmful) will go in order to present the election of pro-life candidates as a critical issue of survivial. Romney and Ryan will have as much power to change the reproductive rights of women as every president and vice president since Roe v. Wade in 1973....zero.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »