.

Council Approves Back Pay for PW Employees

Payment is part of a settlement with the Public Works union over the privatization of the Louis Astorino Ice Rink.

 

The last chapter in the saga involving five Public Works employees and the privatization of the Louis Astorino Ice Rink played out Monday night when the Legislative Council approved the $140,000 salary retropayment.

"This was the payment for lost wages for the time the employees were laid off," Chief Administrative Officer Curt Balzano Leng said.

The employees were laid off July 1, 2010, the date the management of the rink was transferred to a private company. Mayor Scott Jackson and the council approved the privatization as a way to save the town money, claiming that the town's operation of the rink led to a $300,000 yearly loss.

But in June 2011 the State Labor Board  with back pay, agreeing with the United Public Service Employees Union that the layoffs were illegal. 

In August 2011  with the union that called for the retropayment of salaries to the four employees and a secretary, and the money for that payment was officially allocated Monday.

But because those funds were supposed to have been paid last month, the union filed a grievence against the town over it. With it now paid, town officials are hoping that will be withdrawn.

The money was transfered to the town's legal settlement account from a Fire Department salary line, which fire officials warned would mean it would need an extra $200,000 to get through the rest of the fiscal year.

But the bulk of that money will be able to be found internally, Leng said, without having to hit the council's Emergency and Contingency account. 

While some had estimated the payment would total as much as a half million dollars, the $140,000 will end the dispute, Leng said, and give the town the right to continue allowing a private firm to run the rink, saving money in the long run.

But some council members weren't happy with the situation.

"This is a waste of $140,000 of taxpayer's money," said Councilman Michael Colaiacovo Jr. He questioned the wisdom of the town's labor attorney who, he said, had assured town officials that the town would prevail in the union's appeal of the privatization. 

"They said it would be a slam dunk case," he said, "and it's some slam dunk to the taxpayers.

"I think we had some bad advice from our labor attorneys, and here we are two years later," he said, noting that the union still has pending litigation against the town regarding the privatization of recyclables pickups that also resulted in layoffs. "I think it's time we think about changing labor attorneys."

"We didn't get $140,000 worth of work out of them," Councilwoman Betty Wetmore said, "and now we are going to have the same issue with them again," she said, referring to the current case in court. "That's going to be more money."

Leng said he couldn't discuss the details of the current cases with the council in public session but would do so in executive session should the council desire.

"I realize at this point it's all water under the bridge," said Councilwoman Kath Schomaker, and now that the employees will return to work, she wants to see what they will be doing.

"As these folks get back on the payroll, there could be some duplication because we have made arrangements for others to do some of their jobs," she said. "I'm concerned we maximize the use of all personnel.

"I would like to see this because there are things that aren't getting done," she said. "I want to see how we can add value for the taxpayers on the streets."

Charles Baltayan March 06, 2012 at 03:06 PM
$140,000 is the only cost of this debacle being reported here. We have not seen the legal expenditures on the initial court costs and appeals, the loss of revenue from a properly managed rink, the loss of use to the Hamden groups that had to go elsewhere due to the change in management and the extra costs that the skaters families and town had to incur due to the increased prices. The whole privatization issue is a sham that cost taxpayers needlessly when the town acted not in the best interests of its citizens but for political patronage.
Angela March 06, 2012 at 03:28 PM
The hits just keep on coming! When will the people in this town wise up and get rid of all these geniuses? Let the Mayor, and all the rest who got raises, pay the expenses for the poor choises this administration has made. Instead of raises, they should have given back money to the taxpayers for all the wrong decisions.
Marty March 06, 2012 at 04:15 PM
What I don't understand is, the town says it was losing $300,000 a year operating the rink, so how is this company making money where the town couldn't? I'm sure the company operating it isn't losing $300,000 a year, they must be making a profit or they wouldn't do it. Why couldn't the town operate it at a profit?
Linda C March 06, 2012 at 06:16 PM
What More Can One Say!!? Another BRILLIANT MOVE BY MAYOR JACKSON BITES US IN THE END ONCE AGAIN!! PLEASE ENLIGHTEN ME, WHAT WAS IT THAT MADE YOU PEOPLE THINK RE-ELECTING HIM WAS A GOOD IDEA? UNREAL!!
Ellen Nosel March 07, 2012 at 02:18 AM
Unfortunately, most people are not informed when they vote. They assume the people in office are working in their best interest and just keep re-electing them. Sad to say that is not the case in Hamden.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »