Council: No New PW Positions

The Legislative Council Monday put the brakes on funding three new Public Works positions by requiring the proceeds from the sale of the Conte building be returned to the Building Fund, rather than go towards the new position's salaries.


The Legislative Council voted Monday to sell the former Joseph Conte Jewelers property, but with the caveat that the money goes back into the building fund rather than to the Public Works salary account to pay for three new Public Works as the administration wanted.

Eli's on Whitney will purchase the site located at 2384 Whitney Ave. next to the restaurant for $200,000, $96,200 less that the town paid for the property in October 2008. The town also will invest almost $50,000 in asbestos remediation and costs to demolish the house on the property before it's sold to the restaurant.

But the sale will put the property, which some say is a difficult site due to its size and lack of parking space, back on the tax roles, which makes the sale worth it.

"We are opening it up to private development, and that is the best way to go," said Councilman-at-Large Austin Cesare. "I understand this is probably not the best amount possible but I feel this is the best deal for the town."

The town also received other value through the purchase of the property by using it as construction offices, thereby avoiding having to pay for trailers that would have been used as offices, Councilwoman-at-Large Kath Schomaker said.

"I like seeing this going back into the private sector," she said. "This is a prime business location and this is a perfect use for the site."

"Prime location" were key words for Councilwoman-at-Large Berita Rowe-Lewis.

"I'm not in favor of unloading prime real estate and not making anything on the deal," she said. "I think this is something we could hold on to."

The town looked into possible uses for the property, including as additional parking for the Fire Department and Memorial Town Hall, and decided it wasn't needed, Chief Administrative Officer Curt Balzano Leng said. And whether it is sold or retained, the building has to come down because it's blighted, he said.

"So it's an empty lot vs. selling it for tax revenue," he said.

Interested in Hamden's news, events, community bulletins, blogs and businesses? Sign up for the free Hamden Patch daily newsletter"like" us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

The town looked into a reverse bid sale rather than selling it through a bid waiver to Eli's, Leng said, but feared that the bid sale would bring in lower prices that the Eli's sale.

"My concern is that the taxpayers paid $296,000 for this piece of property that we are going to sell for $200,000 and add $50,000 to that cost," Councilman Harry Gagliardi said. "It will take us 50 to 100 years to recoup this loss and that's ridiculous."

"I have spent a long time going around talking to everyone about this and at first I was against it," council president Judi Kozak said. "But what are we going to do with it? It's right next to a fire department where you have sirens going off, it's a dangerous spot to begin with that is very, very tight.

"I would like to see it go on the tax rolls," she said.

As the full council was about to vote on the proposal, Gagliardi offered an amendment to the proposal -- that the proceeds of the sale go back into the building fund from where they came.

The administration had voiced an intent for the money to be used to fund the three additional Public Works positions proposed last month. Some council members weren't happy about using a one-time funding source to pay for positions that would have to be funded on a yearly basis.

"This way, the taxpayers loose only $100,000" rather than have to keep funding the positions year after year, Gagliardi said.

His peers apparently agreed, approving the motion before approving the sale.

Jaimie Cura December 04, 2012 at 02:27 PM
Dee Delise wrote on the Hamden Patch Facebook page: "That is so typical for Hamden! Not only will U take a loss on the price of the property but then U will pay extra to fix the property for Eli's! That should be Eli's problem if he wants the property so bad! Which we all know he does! The profit ~if any~ is going to pay for 3 public work employees? For how long? Then where does the money come from? Come on people!!" www.facebook.com/hamdenpatch
Angela December 04, 2012 at 03:32 PM
If Eli's wants this property so badly let them do the remediation and demoition, why does the town have to assume the cost? Makes no sense. They are getting the piece of prime real estate and the town assumes the cost for remediation and demolition...where are the thinkers in this town?
Jaimie Cura December 04, 2012 at 04:47 PM
Shannon McKeon: "I think the tax benefit will be worth it. Also, real estate is a bit of a gamble. People all over the country are selling homes for less than what they paid for them." David G. Johnson: "Even the Town (through Vision Appraisal) has the property appraised at $250K. But then, those Vision Appraisal "appraisals" always seem to be a lot higher than the real world." Joe Cafasso: "The loss that Hamden will take seems pretty much on par for the Real Estate market from 2008 to current. The fact that Eli's may really want the property is most likely protecting the town from taking a bigger hit if someone else was to purchase it." Folks on Facebook weigh in: www.facebook.com/hamdenpatch
Linda C December 04, 2012 at 06:09 PM
I vote we take the money from the sale of the Conte building and buy each board member a CALCULATOR!!! HOW LONG WILL WE SIT IN SILENCE AND WATCH HAMDEN IMPLODE?
Thomas Alegi December 04, 2012 at 08:39 PM
‘The town also will invest almost $50,000 in asbestos remediation and costs to demolish the house on the property before it's sold to the restaurant. ( Eli's)” Referring to the former Joseph Conte Jewelers building on Whitney Ave. Now this is what Councilwoman-at-Large Kath Schomaker said. “The town also received other value through the purchase of the property by using it as construction offices, thereby avoiding having to pay for trailers that would have been used as offices.” Let us put these to above pieces together and see what the end outcome is? There is asbestos in the former Joseph Conte Jewelers building and the town of Hamden used this building for construction offices for how long, with humans working in an asbestos environment. One would think with the amount of time Hamden’s L/C has spent over the years addressing asbestos issues in town owned buildings, the L/C would have realized there was asbestos in the building, due to its age. One more thought did the workers who worked in the former Joseph Conte Jewelers Building that the town of Hamden owns; know of the possible asbestos environment. If not, I won’t ask any further questions, but to ask, Councilwoman-at-Large Schomaker is there any other unforeseen worth that will be coming down the road from the sale of the former Joseph Conte Jewelers Building?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »