It is an unspoken right – and even social expectation -- among those who have reached a certain age to express concern about the younger generations. You know the comments:
- “Kids today just don’t have any respect for authority.”
- “What’s going to happen when these kids start running the country? We are going to be in serious trouble.”
- And a host of remarks that begin with something like…“When we were growing up, we didn’t have…”
But today, perhaps more than at any other time since the height of the Baby Boom Generation, parenting styles also have taken the spotlight. We hear much of what happens if you raise your children without structure and rules, and what happens if you have too much structure and too many rules. We hear about raising your kids with too much self-esteem and not enough self-esteem. And you might remember all the media attention paid to the “Tiger Mom” and how it prompted a national discussion about parenting.
Nevertheless, it is the phenomenon of Helicopter Parents that is the most discussed and analyzed by professional psychologists, family therapy experts, parents and educators. The consensus is that this type of parenting, while often well-intended, tends to do more harm than good. For those who may not have heard of the term, it refers to parents who are overly involved in their children’s lives and who tend to “micromanage” their kids’ day. In many instances, this “hyper-involvement” continues into the college years and sometimes even beyond. The consequences of this type of parenting style can include hindering kids’ ability to gain a proper amount of age-appropriate independence and to solve their own problems.
Suzanne Carroll, professor of marriage and family therapy at Southern, and Phyllis Gordon, manager of the university’s Family Therapy Clinic, are quite familiar with this trend. Both say that many people might not even be aware that they have fallen into the Helicopter Parents category. They offer four examples of how you know you are probably a Helicopter Parent:
- You are doing homework assignments for your child or are frequently checking to make sure they’ve done them.
- You are the one managing their responsibilities, such as doing their homework, waking up on time and attending athletic team practices.
- You refer to your child’s team, club or organization as “we.” For example, saying that “we have a game today.”
- You and your child are communicating too frequently, such as with multiple texts and/or phone calls each day.
Carroll and Gordon are not in any way suggesting that parents should be oblivious to their children’s lives. On the contrary, they underscore the importance of showing concern for their children’s well-being. But being overly involved in their lives can create long-term problems. Here are some suggestions that Carroll and Gordon offer to strike that balance of being a responsible mom or dad without being a Helicopter Parent:
- Set REALISTIC goals and expectations with your child, based on their age and abilities.
- Work with your child to make a plan (if needed), on how to meet those goals/expectations.
- Step back. Have your child take responsibility for meeting those goals/expectations.
- Be prepared to renegotiate.
- Let your child accept the natural consequences of their efforts.
Carroll and Gordon recognize that resisting the inclination of parents to “fix” their children’s every problem or task can be difficult – especially at first. After all, it is perfectly natural for parents not to want to see their children struggle. And, of course, there are times when swift parental intervention is necessary. But a consistent pattern of micromanaging can have significant consequences as a child gets older and enters the world of adulthood.
“Remember, parenting is the illusion of control,” Carroll says.
For additional reading about the phenomenon of Helicopter Parents, check out a recent column written by Anne Michaud, interactive editor at Newsday.
If you let a 7th grader write a book report and you don’t interact with him, on average he will get an average grade. What does that tell him? For one thing he learns that getting a B is okay in his parents’ eyes. So why should he work any harder? Mom and Dad don’t seem to care. Is that him learning responsibility? Or is that him learning how to squeak by with minimal effort? Contrast that with the child of the conscientious parent. The 7th grader has to write a book report. The conscientious parent talks about what kinds of books the child might find interesting. After the chosen book is read, the conscientious parent asks the child questions about the themes in the book. The conscientious parent reads the report and comments on poor grammar and unsupported statements. A learning opportunity. The parent augments what the teacher is doing. In the end, the child of the conscientious parent puts in X times the effort. Do the conscientious parents write the report. No, that would be wrong. But the conscientious parents help the child understand that a great effort is expected and achievable.
I think non-helicopter parents are hiding behind some misinformation that they have somehow taught their kids to be more responsible. I think it is not true. The child of the conscientious parent turns out to be much more responsible.
As teachers, we DO want parents who are involved with their children and in their child's education. I think we also believe in the concept of gradual release of responsibility. What I mean by that is that, year by year, as parents, we want to work towards having our children take on more and more responsibility as far as homework goes. The eventual aim is for them to be able to plan their afternoon, knowing what's going on after school, and scheduling their homework time in accordingly. They should be able to eventually plan out how they will tackle long-term homework assignments. They should come to you, (rather than you asking to see it) for editing help, with any essay-type assignments. My high school aged son knows that his father and I are always available to help him with his homework--all he needs to do is ask. What we don't do is constantly monitor him. He gets good grades, and so there is no need.
With our older son, when he started high school, his grades weren't very good, and, after talking with his teachers, we learned that the grades reflected his poor homework grades. In that instance, we took a much more hands-on approach with him. He knew he would have to show us his planner every day. He knew that, after he had finished his homework, he would have to show it to us and show that it was a reflection of what he had written down in his planner. After doing this for several months, we gradually dialed back the checking on him, until he finally could handle it on his own. Then he was finally in the situation like we are now with our other, younger son. He was on the honor roll, and felt very good about the fact that he was managing his work himself. I think, Digby, we really have more in common than you are thinking. I am enjoying our well thought out discussion, and I respect your interest in the topic, and the care and commitment you have as a mother!
"There is an overwhelming attitude around here that if anyone does better than our own children... well.... that person must have cheated, or they must be insulted, or they must be punished in some other way. " Then digby says "I said something that bruised your ego, so you need to put me down. Goes to exactly what I am talking about." Do you even hear what youre saying? You go through this entire litany of who the 'other' parents are. If they complain about helicopter parents, then they are pot smoking, ego driven, low brow racists. But-not you. You are the exception and all the parents that dont conform to your approach are losing. Ie--the 'overwhelming attitude." Could you let me know if all those insults are not 'put downs?" Or are you saying that you can accuse people, judge people, and insult people--but if someone does it to you--then , well they are covering something up? I mean are you so self righteous that you cannot even notice all the crap you just hurled at an entiire town, while at the same time saying no one is allowed to question you? Wow
Simple question. Your child gets a B in a subject. What happens next in your house?
Nice one. 1 Believe urban legend. 2- justify all decisions based on myth. Incredible that in your mind, there are all these pot smoking, sex promoting, ego invested parents. While at the same time, your daughter needs to text you about a show that aired at 7pm. Wonder what you were doing that prevented her from asking you those questions ? Maybe having a key party with your neighbors? That urban legend also exists, so lets leap to conclusions about your parenting, as you do with all the other parents. How absurd you are that you need to justify your helicopter parenting on the concept that there is rampant sex occuring on school buses. Oh my gosh the lengths that one needs to go to, in order to legitimize breast feeding your kid until they are in college.
It's not even that. I look at the Gen X and Gen Y parents of today and shake my head in disgust. I'm a millennial and tell myself everyday that I will not do what these "parents" do. Read the book, "The 4th turning: An American Philosophy". The author did an amazing job describing the cyclical events of each generation and how it can help predict where we are going as a society. Its very interesting and gave me a lot of insight on why parents of today's generation behave the way they do and what kind of generation you were born in and how that affects your life path.
95% proficiency that takes 5 hours is better than 100% proficiency that takes 10 hours. At a certain point you're just wasting time trying to be perfect.
each child as others mentioned, have vastly differing aspirations, capacity and ability. good children result from giving the kid the right 'kick of encouragement' at the right time, & knowing when requires involvement, rather than 'management'. being fully aware of the child, respecting and sustaining a clear communication pathway is the basis for trust. absolute power corrupts absolutely i was told, it denies development and the integral thought process's needed (and they vary) at each stage of young peoples lives. throw in chemical adulterants (Drugs of any sort) and the child will be altered, and denied the full capacity the of their normal brain. if you ever see kids 'outa control', if and when, then there's a significant communication issue in play, both ways. it's not a one way street, excepting known dysfunction or physical issues. frustration is not a 'child only' condition either, adults can and will experience it. perfect children don't exist, never will, and we as parents are a testament to that.
Funny how it works though isn't it. I just relayed what some adults inappropriately said in front of school children, and I rightfully get censored. Yet the adults who made the original statements, who is there to censor them from saying such things in front of the kids? Such is life I guess. Again, apologies for using those words.
Was I not conscientious?
But when is the right time? Do we leave them to their own devices starting in 7th grade and tell them to give a call if the decide to go to college? I say no way. They still need guidance all the way through high school and beyond. yinyang: "Im a high school teacher...These kids will someday be shocked when they lose a job or end up in jail because Mom and Dad can't shield them from the consequences of their bigger screw ups as adults." I'm saddened to think you are a teacher. I would expect a more nurturing personality in a teacher. Susan Parent: "if after giving it their all only managed to get a C, that was ok." I think this is wrong. You showed your kids that a C is okay. How does that prepare them for life, to show them a bad job is acceptable? Getting a C means they have poor academic habits. This isn't for the child to fix. It needs the parents' intervention. "Somehow they all managed to become honor roll students, were accepted into colleges of their choice, and were dean's list students. Two of the three chose to continue with graduate degrees and completed their degrees with a 4.0 GPA. All are working in their chosen fields. Was I not conscientious?" It depends. Maybe they only had "C" ambitions and they now work at the mall.